المصدر: شبكة الإنترنت
نسبة بعض النظريات وأهمها
النظرية النسبية إلى
العالم الفيزيائي آينشتاين.
تثبت هذه المقالة
أن معظم ما تمت نسبته إلى
آينشتاين كان قد ألفه
علماء غيره وتم نشره بأسمائهم
في مجلات علمية عالمية
قبل أن ينشره آينشتاين
وكأنه من عمله أو من اكتشافاته.
هناك أيضاً مقالات
كثيرة في هذا الموضوع
بل وهناك كتاب كامل في
الموضوع موثق بالكامل
يثبت ما ذهبت إليه هذه
المقالة بل يذهب إلى أبعد
لمؤلف هذا المقال فيبدو
أن مؤلفه يهودي مثل آينشتاين
ولكن له أسباباً لتبيان
الحقيقة, فلنا منه معرفة
الحقيقة ونترك له أسبابه.
-- was he a thief, a liar and a plagiarist?
ALBERT EINSTEIN is held up as "a rare genius," who drastically
changed the field of theoretical physics. However, using the technique known as 'The Often-Repeated Lie=Truth,' he has been
made an idol to young people, and his very name has become synonymous with genius.
THE TRUTH, HOWEVER, IS VERY DIFFERENT.
Einstein was an inept and moronic person, who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed NOTHING ORIGINAL to the
field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. On the contrary -- he stole the ideas of others, and the Jew-controlled
media made him a 'hero.'
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only 'brilliance'
was in his ability to PLAGIARIZE and STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S IDEAS, PASSING THEM OFF AS HIS OWN. Einstein's education, or lack
thereof, is an important part of this story.
The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education
that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and
languages, he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of imagination and practical
ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.
This exam consisted
mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser
school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900,
he still could not get a position at the engineering school!
Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a
job (with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third class, which meant that
he was not competent to hold a higher qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called ground-breaking papers of 1905
and after working in the patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work
he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics,
but was reviewing technical documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely qualified.
He would work
at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without success.
All of these facts are true, but now begins the myth.
Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of
university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an academic
setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics
that were published in 1905.
Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein himself,
and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because
indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age
of 26 without any real education. THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.
Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of each. It should be remembered
that these ideas are presented by Einstein's worshipers as totally new and completely different, each of which would change
the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:
The foundation of the photon theory of light;
The equivalence of energy and mass;
The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity.
This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein
called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915).
This theory contradicted the traditional
Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two premises:
In the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and
Since the speed of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval between two events
is longer for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different places than for an observer in whose frame
of reference the events occur in the same place.
This is basically the idea that time passes
more slowly as one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where time would pass faster.
theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for modern physics. But these two premises are far from being
originally Einstein's. FIRST
OF ALL, THE IDEA THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT WAS A CONSTANT AND WAS INDEPENDENT OF THE MOTION OF ITS SOURCE WAS NOT EINSTEIN'S
AT ALL, BUT WAS PROPOSED BY THE SCOTTISH SCIENTIST JAMES MAXWELL in 1878.
Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed
that it was electromagnetic in nature.
James Maxwell wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of
the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing debate,
the scientific community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the velocity of light was
independent of the velocity of the observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years before
Einstein wrote his paper.
This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to conduct an important
experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity
but they did not understand relativity.
They had attempted to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which
was a medium thought to be necessary for the propagation of light. In response to this problem, in 1880, the Irish physicist
George Fitzgerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the
results of the Michelson Morley experiment could be explained if, ". . . the length of material bodies change, according as
they are moving through the either or across it by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities to that
IS THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY, 13 YEARS BEFORE EINSTEIN'S PAPER!
FURTHER . . . IN 1892, HENDRIK LORENTZ, of the Netherlands, proposed
the same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's, both Lorentz and Fitzgerald worked on these
ideas and wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-Fitzgerald
In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction
and its relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, "Lorentz transformations," the series of equations explaining relativity,
were published by Lorentz. They describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the time dilation of a body moving
at speeds close to the velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything in "Einstein's paper" regarding the Special Theory
of Relativity had already been published.
The Frenchman Poincaré‚ had, in 1898,
written a paper unifying many of these ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper: ". . . we have no direct intuition
about the equality of two time intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well as the
equality of two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."
Professor Umberto Bartocci, a mathematical historian, of the University of Perugia claims that Olinto De Pretto,
an industrialist from Vicenza, published the equation E=mc^2 in a scientific magazine, Atte, in 1903. Einstein allegedly
used De Pretto's insight in a major paper published in 1905, but De Pretto was never acclaimed.
De Pretto had stumbled
on the equation, but not the theory of relativity, while speculating about ether in the life of the universe, said Prof Bartocci.
It was republished in 1904 by Veneto's Royal Science Institute, but the equation's significance was not understood.
to Professor Bartocci, a Swiss Italian named Michele Besso alerted Einstein to the research and in 1905 Einstein published
his own work. It took years for his breakthrough to be grasped. When the penny finally dropped, De Pretto's contribution was
overlooked while Einstein went on to become the century's most famous scientist. De Pretto died in 1921.
did not discover relativity but there is no doubt that he was the first to use the equation. That is hugely significant. I
also believe, though it's impossible to prove, that Einstein used De Pretto's research," said Professor Bartocci, who has
written a book on the subject. ( The Guardian
who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein.
Thus, we see that the only thing original
about the paper was the term 'Special Theory of Relativity.' EVERYTHING ELSE WAS PLAGIARIZED. Over the next few years, Poincaré‚
became one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or speeches,
mentioned Albert Einstein.
Thus while Poincaré‚ was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed regarding relativity, Einstein
was still working in the patent office in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it necessary to give much credence
or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early physicists knew that he was a fraud.
This brings us to the explanation
of Brownian motion, the subject of another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion
of a body arising from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The movement had
first been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827.
The explanation of this phenomenon has to
do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann
who first explained this occurrence, not Albert Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion contains
the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper
regarding Brownian motion.
The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third paper
published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the famous equation E=mc2. Einstein's biographers categorize this
as "his most famous and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this idea is an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier
relativity paper, it was not included in that paper but was published as an afterthought later in the year. Still, the idea
of energy-mass equivalence was not original with Einstein.
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had
been shown in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J. J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen.
In 1900, Poincaré‚ had shown that there was a mass relationship for all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy.
Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet unappreciated
physicists of the era.
Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many of the German scientists who would later become famous for
a variety of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and energy for many years and had published a paper
on the topic in 1904 in the very same journal which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant
work in this area, Hasenöhrl had received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.
the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish
physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc2
was the logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it.
THUS, THE EXPERIMENTS OF THOMSON, KAUFMANN, AND FINALLY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY,
HASENÖRHL, CONFIRMED MAXWELL'S WORK. IT IS LUDICROUS TO BELIEVE THAT EINSTEIN DEVELOPED THIS POSTULATE , particularly in light of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory
necessary to conduct the appropriate experiments.
In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to
the scientific community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable
to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium)."
This remark demonstrates how little Einstein understood about science,
for this was truly an outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein showed that he really did not understand basic scientific
principles, and that he was writing about a topic that he did not understand. In fact, in response to this article, J. Precht
remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible experience."
The last subject dealt with in Einstein's
1905 papers was the foundation of the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric
effect is the release of electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the action of light. This area of research is
particularly important to the Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he UNJUSTLY received his 1922 Nobel Prize.
IT IS NOT EINSTEIN, BUT WILHELM WIEN AND MAX PLANCK WHO DESERVE THE CREDIT. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point for which he is given credit,
is that light is emitted and absorbed in finite packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the photoelectric effect.
The photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard,
worked on understanding this phenomenon.
Lenard was the first to show that the energy of the electrons released in
the photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity of the light but by the frequency of the light. This was an important
Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern day quantum theory. By 1900, Max
Planck, based upon his and Wien's work, had shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in finite units called
quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900 and Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein limited himself to talking about
one particular type of energy -- light energy. But the principles and equations governing the process in general had been
deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious conclusion of Planck's work was that light also existed
in discrete packets of energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was original.
After the 1905 papers of Einstein
were published, the scientific community took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the patent office until 1909
when it was arranged by World Jewry for him to take a position at a school.
Still, it was not until a 1919 A Jewish
newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety. With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position
where he could begin to use other people's work as his own more openly.
He engaged many of his students to look for
ways to prove the theories he had supposedly developed, or ways to apply those theories, and then he could present the research
as his own or at least take partial credit.
In this vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his gravitational research
in terms of a new, recently developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding relativity. This was the beginning of
his General Theory of Relativity, which he would publish in 1915.
BUT THE MATHEMATICAL WORK WAS NOT DONE BY EINSTEIN -- HE WAS INCAPABLE OF IT. Instead, it was performed by the mathematician
Marcel Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical principles developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first
to develop a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics used to describe relativity.
General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to the universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets
and their orbits, and the general principle that light rays bend as they pass by a massive object. Einstein published an initial
paper in 1913 based upon the work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to Relativity. But this paper was filled
with errors and the conclusions were incorrect.
It appears that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it out for
Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his correct General
Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its publication that he, "completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert and Klein."
He is referring to David Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix
Klein, another mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the area of calculus that Grossmann had used
to develop the General Theory of Relativity for Einstein.
Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the
reader to believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions regarding General Relativity, and that he had influenced
them in their thinking.
However, the exact opposite is true. EINSTEIN STOLE THE MAJORITY OF HIS GENERAL RELATIVITY WORK FROM THESE TWO MEN,
THE REST BEING TAKEN FROM GROSSMANN. HILBERT SUBMITTED FOR PUBLICATION, A WEEK BEFORE EINSTEIN COMPLETED HIS WORK, A PAPER
WHICH CONTAINED THE CORRECT FIELD EQUATIONS, OF GENERAL RELATIVITY.
What this means is that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper,
with the same conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along,
because there were friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper
in advance of publishing his own. Both of these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the form of a lecture.
presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November
18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on
the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert
had sent a copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two men delivered their lectures,
but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of his.
Therefore, THIS SERVES AS INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF THAT EINSTEIN QUICKLY PLAGIARIZED THE WORK
AND THEN PRESENTED IT, HOPING TO BEAT HILBERT TO THE PUNCH. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began to belittle Hilbert, even though
in the previous summer he had praised him in an effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made the mistake
of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he delivered his work first.
Not only did Hilbert publish his work
first, but it was of much higher quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many problems with assumptions
made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the forerunner
of the unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger, whose work is
the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics.
That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators
of the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting
in Austria declared that "before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations
of the theory of relativity." However the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did not promote
the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew Albert Einstein.
As we mentioned earlier,
this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first and in plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays should
bend when they pass by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close to
the Sun was observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence supported the General Theory of Relativity, and the Jew-controlled
media immediately seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert.
On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline of which proclaimed, "Revolution in science --
New theory of the Universe -- Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the force- feeding of the Einstein myth
to the masses. In the following years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the
originator of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the Jewish media, in 1922, EINSTEIN RECEIVED THE NOBEL PRIZE FOR THE WORK HE HAD STOLEN
IN 1905 REGARDING THE PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT.
The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an important coup for world Zionism
and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been established as an idol to the popular masses of England and America, his image was
promoted as the rare genius that he is erroneously believed to be today.
As such, he immediately began his work as
a tool for World Zionism. The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant as to change our fundamental understanding
of the universe, then certainly we ought to listen to his opinions regarding political and social issues.
exactly what World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of social engineering. They certainly did not want someone
like David Hilbert to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come from a strong German, Christian background.
His grandfather's two middle names were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In August of 1934, the day before
a vote was to be taken regarding installing Adolf Hitler as President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support
of Adolf Hitler, along with other leading German scientists, that was published in the German newspapers. So the Jews certainly
did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit he deserved.
The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit
he deserved either. This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been important German theologians, and during World
War II he would stay in Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best he could.
The Jews certainly
did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to be heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go
on to teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter expressing his support for the Third Reich.
This Austrian's work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even though it had been criticized by
Einstein, who apparently could not understand it.
T he Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare
genius, even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and contribute to it greatly, as well as develop his famous
uncertainty principle, in addition to describing the modern atom and nucleus and the binding energies that are essential to
THE JEWS DID NOT WANT HEISENBERG PROMOTED AS A GENIUS BECAUSE HE WOULD GO ON TO HEAD THE GERMAN ATOMIC BOMB PROJECT AND SERVE
PRISON TIME AFTER THE WAR FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH THE THIRD REICH.
No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of Germans,
Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even Americans who had contributed to the body of knowledge and
evidence from which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work.
Instead, they needed to erect Einstein as their golden
calf, even though he repeatedly and often embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work
he had supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front page article in which Einstein gave
an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for the "energy of the atom." The article says, "But the
'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that man will someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to
drive a great steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for instance - then, according to Einstein, you are wrong"
Again, Einstein clearly did not understand
the branch of physics he had supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical research was underway
that would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear energy.
But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no
real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real purpose - evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and
World Jewry. Though he did publish other articles after this time, all of them were co- authored by at least one other person,
and in each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited
by the co-authors in order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began his assault
for World Zionism.
1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a fund- raising tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and
to promote Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his status to gain membership in a Commission of the League of Nations.
In February of 1923, Einstein visited Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he became a founding member of the Association
of Friends of the New Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist and Zionistic activities to again embarrass
himself scientifically by criticizing the work of Schr”dinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief illness, he resumed
his Zionistic agenda, wanting an independent Israel and at the same time a World Government.
In the 1930s he actively
campaigns against all forms of war, although he would reverse this position during World War II when he advocated war against
Germany and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he thought was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the
request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an American program to develop an atomic bomb to be used on Germany
- not Japan. Einstein would have no part in the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked
the skills for either.
In December of 1946, Einstein rekindled his efforts for a World Government, with Israel apparently
being the only autonomous nation. This push continued through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental
in the creation of the State of Israel, both politically and economically, was offered the presidency of Israel. He declined.
In 1953, he spent his time attacking the McCarthy Committee, and
he supported Communists such as J. Robert Oppenheimer. He encouraged civil disobedience in response to the McCarthy trials.
Finally, on April 18, 1955, this Jewish demagogue died.
Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making
stupid statements. His death was just the beginning of his usage and exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media
continued to promote the myth of this Super-Jew long after his death, and as more and more of the men who knew better died
off, the Jews were more and more able to aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly. This brazen lying has culminated in the
Jew-controlled Time Magazine naming Einstein "The Person of the Century".
Einstein was given this title
in spite of the clear-cut choice for the "Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of
the Year" while he was still living by Time Magazine, and according to a December 27, 1999, article in the USA
Today, Einstein was chosen over Adolf Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public relations fallout" that would accompany
that choice; yet in internet polling by Time, Hitler finished third and was the top serious candidate. Still the issue
of Time Magazine dedicated to Einstein, which has articles by men with names like Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine,
and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For one, they found it necessary to include an article rationalizing why they did
not pick the obvious choice, Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is the article by Stephen Hawking which purports to be a history
of the theory of relativity. In it, Hawking admits many things in this article, such as the fact that Hilbert published the
General Theory of Relativity before Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of relativity long before
Einstein. Hawking also writes:
"Einstein was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul
Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schr”dinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics.
Einstein was horrified by this. Most scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed
excellent agreement with observations. They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics
and the foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the past half- century".
This is all very true,
yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all of the modern developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein was so
stupid as to be vehemently against the most important idea of modern science, just as he opposed Schr”dinger's work
in unified field theory which was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that "success eluded" Einstein in the field
of explaining the contradictions between relativity and quantum mechanics. Today, these contradictions are explained by the
unified field theory, but Einstein, who proved himself to be one of the least intelligent of 20th century scientists,
refused to believe in either quantum theory or the unified field theory.
To name Einstein as "The Person of the
Century" is one of the most ludicrous and absurd lies of all time, yet it has been successfully pulled off by Isaacson,
Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of Time Magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted
to give the title to an inventor or scientist, then the most obvious choice would have been men like Hilbert, Planck, or Heisenberg.
If they wanted to give it to the scientist who most fundamentally changed the lands 20th century science, then
the obvious choice would be William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist invented the transistor, which is the basis
of all modern electronic devices and computers, everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs and watches, to the amazing
computers which have allowed incomprehensible advances in all fields of science. Without the transistor, all forms of science
today would be basically in the same place that they were in the late 1940s.
However, the Jews cannot allow the due
credit to go to William Shockley because he spent the majority of his scientific career demonstrating the genetic and mental
inferiority of non-whites and arguing for their sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the Jews to financially destroy
Shockley who founded Shockley Semiconductor the first company
in Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff and used them to start Fairchild semiconductor in 1957 (co-founded
by the "Traitorous Eight": Julius Blank, Victor Grinich, Jean Hoerni, Gene Kleiner, Jay Last, Gordon Moore, Robert Noyce and
Sheldon Roberts. Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore left Fairchild in 1968 to found Intelco . Many other Fairchild
employees later the company - later called Intel.
No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our
time be recognized, not Henry Ford, not the great German scientists who helped the National Socialists in Germany, not Charles
Lindbergh, who was sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and certainly not William Shockley, one of the most brilliant
physicists and geneticists of our time. Instead, the Jews propped up the Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything
After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race and of the Germans in particular in
the following statements. He was asked what he thought about Germany and about re-educating the Germans after the war and
"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870. Behind the Nazi party stands the German
people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book and in his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the possibility
of misunderstanding. The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic
way of thinking and acting".
Einstein here is advocating the murder of Germans, because he feels that this is the
only way that they can be kept in check. He is right about one thing, the Germans did knowingly support the cause of National
Socialism, but what Einstein is attacking is Christianity, because it was Christianity that led the German people to overwhelmingly
support National Socialism. It was the German Christian Faith Movement and the Christian Social Party of men like Karl Lueger
that led the German people to their understanding of Jews. The Jew Daniel Goldhagen has recently shown the Christian basis
of National Socialism in his book, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, and the book
Why The Jews? by Prager and Telushkin similarly proves the Christian origins of what the Jews call 'anti-Semitism.'
Einstein understood this and Einstein, like all Jews, hated Christianity. So what Einstein was really advocating was the killing
and constraining of all true Christians, not just Germans Christians. This is the true purpose and intent of Zionism and the
demagogue Einstein was merely a tool of World Zionism and Jewry towards this end.
Zionistic Jews understand that true,
primitive Christianity is the mortal enemy of mongrel Judaism. This is why the Jews, like Einstein, hated Nazi Germany so
much, for National Socialist Germany advocated primitive, positive Christianity in the 24th point of its Party
Lewis L. Strauss, the Zionist Chairman of the US Atomic Commission, must have had in mind storing the world
stock of A and H bombs in the neutral country of Israel (also chosen for the United Nations' permanent headquarters) for safekeeping
to 'satisfy Russian demands,' when, as reported in the London Jewish Chronicle of 11th December, 1953, he 'assisted'
President Eisenhower in writing the speech in which Eisenhower told the UN General Assembly that the USA would be prepared
to ease international tension by handing over her Atom and Hydrogen weapons to UNO. Eisenhower does not hesitate to accept
the advice of Strauss, although this Zionist financier is senior partner in the New York International Banking firm of Kuhn,
Loeb and Co. which in 1917, under the direction of Jacob Schiff, then the acknowledged leader of world Jewry, financed the
Bolshevist revolutionary Trotsky to the extent of 20 million dollars.
Albert Einstein, the Zionist scientist, (described
by Pravda as one of the ten best friends of the Soviet Union in the USA) was also thinking along the same lines when
he persuaded Roosevelt (Redfield) to authorize research into nuclear fission, and recommended the employment of other Zionist
scientists, who were later to pass the result of the researches to the Soviet Union.
Oppenheimer, the chief Einstein
appointee, now in disgrace for Communist sympathies, and holding up production of the hydrogen bombs until Russia came into
possession of its secrets: Pontecorvo, the entire host of Zionist scientists and agents working for Communism in the notorious
spy rings of America, Canada, Australia and Great Britain: all have obviously been striving to bring about the present situation.
It is this overriding ambition which drives Zionists, even the most wealthy, to support Communism, either openly or
secretly, only to bring the world to a point where it would seem it must accept their long envisaged 'peace plan.'
"One of the major reasons for my visit to the United States," said the mayor of Jerusalem, according to the South African
Jewish Times of 14th March, 1952, "is to interest Americans in the beautification of Jerusalem, the Capital of the World,
no less than the Capital of Israel."
It all has been decided as described above. Why has so little been heard about
it? For the simple reason that IT HAS BEEN DECIDED. The matter will not be thrown open for Gentile discussion in the popular
(?) press UNTIL the Nations are browbeaten to the point where they are ready to acknowledge the Zionists' "International Super-Government,
and WITH SUBMISSIVENESS".
(Note: On November 21, 1954, Czecho-Slovakia called upon the Western Powers to delay signing
the Paris Agreement regarding the re-armament of West Germany, until they had discussed with the Russian bloc an agreement
which might eventually result in a United States of Europe. A 'United States of Europe' was the aim of Trotsky stated in Bolshevism
and World Peace, published in 1918. "The task of the proletariat is to create a still more powerful fatherland with a
far greater power of resistance - the Republican United States of Europe, as the foundation of the United States of the World").
Jews have been heavily overrepresented among the ranks of theoretical physicists. This conclusion remains true even
though Einstein, the leading figure among Jewish physicists, was a strongly motivated Zionist (F”lsing 1997, 494505),
opposed assimilation as a contemptible form of mimicry (p. 490), preferred to mix with other Jews whom he referred to as his
tribal companions (p. 489), embraced the uncritical support for the Bolshevik regime in Russia typical of so many Jews during
the 1920s and 1930s, including persistent apology for the Moscow show trials in the 1930s (pp. 6445), and switched from a
high-minded pacifism during World War I, when Jewish interests were not at stake, to advocating the building of atomic bombs
to defeat Hitler. From his teenage years he disliked the Germans and in later life criticized Jewish colleagues for converting
to Christianity and acting like Prussians. He especially disliked Prussians, who were the elite ethnic group in Germany. Reviewing
his life at age 73, Einstein declared his ethnic affiliation in no uncertain terms: 'My relationship with Jewry had become
my strongest human tie once I achieved complete clarity about our precarious position among the nations' (in F”lsing
1997, 488). According to F”lsing, Einstein had begun developing this clarity from an early age, but did not acknowledge
it until much later, a form of self-deception: As a young man with bourgeois-liberal views and a belief in enlightenment,
he had refused to acknowledge it until much later, a form of self-deception: As a young man with bourgeois-liberal views and
a belief in enlightenment, he had refused to acknowledge [his Jewish identity] (in F”lsing 1997, 488).